The phrase "a much higher average" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing averages in various contexts, such as statistics, performance metrics, or survey results.
Example: "The new training program resulted in a much higher average score among participants compared to last year."
Alternatives: "significantly greater average" or "considerably higher mean".
With around 2.9m iPads shipped in the first three quarters of 2013 Apple claimed the premium end of the market, with each unit sold commanding a much higher average sale price than that of the higher volume low-end market.
However, the Si substrate gave a much higher average reflectance.
Bahir Dar has a much higher average annual rate of urban expansion than Hawassa.
The results show that for α < 1, the finite buffer traffic model presents a much higher average user throughput gain than the full buffer model.
Local-scale losses were most prominent in unprotected forests around Budongo and Bugoma, with annual losses at a much higher average rate about of 3.3% per year in each case.
However, the nanolubricating oil with C16-ZrP-N12 C16-ZrP-N12 C16-ZrP-N12avexhibitsF of about 0.35, even higher than the pure muchral oil withigherveraverage of about 0.33.
That is about one in six of the dogs in pounds - a much higher proportion than the UK average.
Furthermore, choosing a universal control with much higher average coverage of the genome than the sample yields higher similarity of CNV profiles to the GC content normalization.
In other words, if the aim is to maintain higher agreement with the CNV calls out of the GC content normalization procedure, a control genome with similar average coverage as the sample genome (YRI1) might be preferable to a control genome with much higher average coverage (YRI2).
Although the lung data set is structurally different than ovarian with a smaller sample size and much higher average mutation rate, the qualitative results from each method are similar.
In contrast, the concordance correlation within the same amplification method revealed much higher average coefficients, and thus a much higher agreement (0.63 ± 0.05).
