The phrase "a much bigger sample" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the size of a sample in research, statistics, or data analysis, indicating that the sample is significantly larger than another.
Example: "To improve the reliability of our results, we need to collect a much bigger sample than we initially planned."
Alternatives: "a significantly larger sample" or "a considerably bigger sample".
Twelve drives, say, multiplied by 16 games is a much bigger sample.
And the state polls which collectively represent a much bigger sample of voters than the national ones, and enable us to project what matters, which is the electoral college tell a very different tale.There are indeed a number of states that are extremely close.
The @NYTimes account has 1.5 million followers, which is probably a much bigger sample than the people who managed to find the poll hidden away on the Insight Lab site.
Perhaps an index could be devised for a much bigger sample than the data set collected in the present study which should be tested for its correspondence to the realisations.
Also, this second factor analysis was performed on a much bigger sample.
As a means of validating initial positive findings, a two-stage design may be used in which a large number of potential positive findings from the initial genome-wide analysis are tested in a much bigger sample.
The accelerator will then turn on again sometime in March to start colliding protons again so that we can collect a much bigger data sample.
However, for subgroup analysis researchers would need much bigger samples of respondents, which raises questions about the feasibility of survey based methods in measuring these complicated constructs.
It's worth mentioning that the categorization or wording of a particular ADL-IADL item (i.e., the differences that often occur between large surveys or cohorts) can prevent data from being pooled to create much bigger samples with increased statistical power.
Findings based on analyzing a small number of deeply profiled DNA methylomes (i.e., a discovery panel) can then be validated using array-based approaches, which can be applied to a much bigger number of samples (i.e., a validation panel).
On the other hand, IMG sampled a much bigger part of the spectrum than IRIS could manage.
