The phrase "a much better range" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the quality or variety of options available, typically in contexts like products, services, or features.
Example: "After reviewing the new models, I can confidently say that this brand offers a much better range of features than its competitors."
Alternatives: "a significantly improved selection" or "a far superior variety".
Using both externally generated electricity and fuel, this true hybrid has a much better range than cars with no tailpipe.
The plants are still more or less dormant and can be purchased bare-root, which is going to ensure a much better range to choose from and almost certainly cheaper, healthier plants.
But all the papers now have lots of online political journalism that gives you a much better range of opinion, information and sources than you would find in the hard-copy paper.
"There is a lot more available in model ranges and a much better range in terms of price". The competition among manufacturers means that buyers will continue to see discount financing being offered by auto makers and their dealers.
In flight, it moves like a regular propeller plane, giving it much better range and speed than a conventional helicopter.
If the stats remain consistent between this concept and whatever production vehicle gets made in terms of a four-door from BWM in its electric performance lineup, this could be a real Tesla Model S competitor, offering similar performance and potentially much better range, though the figures given today are far from EPA standard tallies.
To address this issue, we investigated experiments conducted on RNA-seq, which has a much better dynamic range.
Whereas dp and dphi range from a low of −.31 (for a dichotomization point set at z = −2.5) to a high of −0.82 (for z = −0.5) when true d is 1.0, dhh performs much better (ranging from −0.88 to −1.23) and dprobit estimates the true effect size the best (ranging from −0.85 to −1.06).
Although the range of predictions by Fold- X has a much better overlap with the range of experimental affinities, the linear correlation as given by r is slightly worse than that obtained with the AutoDock vina predictions.
In can also observed that the MMSE detector exhibits a much better performance for a wide range of SNRs compared to the ZF detector.
The bottom hole pressure, however, shows a much better match in the entire range, validating the history-matching procedure developed in this study.
