The phrase "a motion to accept" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in formal contexts, such as meetings or legal proceedings, to propose that a group agree to a specific action or decision.
Example: "I would like to make a motion to accept the proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year."
Alternatives: "a proposal to approve" or "a request for acceptance".
When Svend Robinson, an MP for the leftish New Democrats and a gay activist, moved a motion to accept the Ontario court ruling, the Liberals on the committee split 5-4 in favour, even though government whips had replaced two opponents of the measure with supporters.
Having gathered on Tuesday to discuss the issue, Scottish Football League clubs will meet again on 12 July when they are expected to vote on a motion to accept the newco in Division One.
drew attention to the quietly passed rule when he attempted to present a motion to accept the Senate's clean continuing resolution and reopen the government.
During a floor speech on Saturday, Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md). drew attention to the quietly passed rule when he attempted to present a motion to accept the Senate's clean continuing resolution and reopen the government.
The City of Yellowknife as well as the Yellowknives Dene First Nation unanimously passed a motion to accept the Review Board's proposed amendments, as they would bring the people a slightly more hopeful future for their area.
Make a formal motion to accept the apologies.
On Tuesday (1/15), the British House of Commons rejected by an overwhelming margin – 432 against, 202 for – the motion to accept the withdrawal agreement and political declaration about the future relationship that Prime Minister Theresa May's government negotiated with the European Union.
He said he felt that Mr. Ward had clearly committed an ethical violation and that the executive committee's motion to accept the ethics panel's finding "did not address the underlying distrust and dysfunction within the U.S.O.C".
Orange County Supervisor Shawn Nelson, who sponsored the initial Dec. 4 motion to accept the industry proposal, argued that the plan does reduce emissions, just not as much as the staff proposal.
When reviewing a motion to dismiss, a court must "accept as true all of the factual allegations set out in plaintiff's complaint, draw inferences from those allegations in the light most favorable to plaintiff, and construe the complaint liberally". Gregory v. Daly, 243 F.3d 691, 691 (2d Cir.2001) (citations omitted).
