The phrase "a motion stating" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or formal contexts when referring to a proposal or request that articulates a specific point or action.
Example: "The committee submitted a motion stating that the project should be approved without further delay."
Alternatives: "a proposal indicating" or "a resolution declaring".
The Oxford Union has passed a motion stating that it is institutionally racist.
In December Taylor's defence team filed a motion stating that the cables revealed political interference in the court.
But students of parliamentary procedure say he almost certainly will allow a motion stating that impeachment is not warranted.
Delegates adopted a motion stating that the curriculum would reduce "creativity and enjoyment at school, alienate young people and lead to more school absence … and disaffection".
The Volusia Canvassing Board has adopted a motion stating that it will comply with the requirements of Florida Statutes, Section 102.111, to certify the results of the election to the Department of State no later than 5 p.m. on Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2000, unless the time is extended by lawful authority.
Earlier this year delegates at the BMA conference passed a motion stating that the "inadequate computer-based assessment" performed by Atos had "little regard for the nature or complexity of the needs of long-term sick and disabled persons", and proposed that the WCA should be halted "with immediate effect".
(r_E) is the ratio between the energy required for a motion state change and the available energy of the assist system: begin{aligned} r_E = frac{|Delta E|}{|E_s|}.
"Motion State nolle". "It would be a motion State nolle prose," the judge repeated.
"It would be a motion State nolle prose," the judge repeated.
It is accepted that these internal models can be characterized by dependence on a motion state -a mapping between motor commands and resulting limb motions-rather than by a dependence on the times when they occur [ 32].
On Tuesday, we tabled an early day motion stating that the revelations exposed in the Guardian that British security services have examined the internet activities of British citizens without the consent of parliament demonstrate that the intelligence and security committee is not fit for purpose.
