The phrase "a motion could be" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the possibility or potential of a motion being made or considered, often in legal or formal settings.
Example: "In this meeting, a motion could be proposed to amend the current policy on employee benefits."
Alternatives: "a proposal might be" or "a resolution could be".
Before any motion could be brought (it was not until 1827 that the laws were revised) the situation in America came up again.
In a photograph of a sailboat, for example, a swaying motion could be applied to the boat and a sideways motion to the clouds; the water, meanwhile, could be animated by algorithms that produce small distortions resembling ripples.
A resonant motion could be induced by forcing a sinusoidal variation of flow Mach number at the resonance frequency, which supplies vibrational energy to the harmonic system generating compressible waves.
Foetal akinesia, defined by an absence of motion, could be interpreted as a sign of (neuro muscular disease in combination with thin muscles and polyhydramnios (Fig. 5); lung hypoplasia and certain facial abnormalities could suggest a Pena-Shokeir phenotype [24].
Only those motions differing from a shared common motion could be seen as moving.
Following mass defections from the Janata Party and from the cabinet, Morarji Desai's 30-month-old government ended in July 1979 after he handed in his resignation to Reddy before a no-confidence motion could be tabled against his government in Parliament.
A rarely-used 'fatal motion' could be tabled in the Lords by the end of this week, paving the way for a vote next Monday with the specific intention of preventing the Chancellor from putting his controversial £4bn proposals into law.
The directions of their motion could be a coincidence, but strong circumstantial evidence indicates that an unseen source of gravity is pulling them.
So, while motion could be a relevant explanation for poor correspondence when the SPECT-derived volume is considerably larger than the morphological volume, we believe it is less likely a cause for underestimation.
