The phrase "a more stringent evidence" is not correct in English.
It should be "more stringent evidence" without the article "a." You can use it when discussing the need for stronger or stricter proof or data in a particular context.
Example: "The study requires more stringent evidence to support its claims about the effectiveness of the treatment."
Alternatives: "stricter evidence" or "stronger evidence."
While building an evidence-based risk score using an appropriate statistical method [ 34] is clearly a desirable goal, it will require more data and more stringent evidence which at present is not available.
This was done for the reader to have the freedom to challenge negative findings at a permissive threshold (p<0.05), while at the same time providing more stringent evidence for the key positive results.
Non-conserved miRNAs require more stringent evidence and proof that they meet the criteria of a real miRNA because they lack one of the strongest pieces of data used to distinguish miRNAs from siRNAs conservation across species boundaries.
Improvements may not transfer from the trained function to more general visual behaviour, 24 so more stringent evidence is needed to help guide whether vision training should be offered to some or all children with VND.
Evidence for kin discrimination often relies on correlational evidence without demonstration of exact mechanisms, yet skeptics of reciprocity increasingly require far more stringent evidence than mere correlation or even contingency.,,, Vampire bats demonstrate symmetrical exchanges of help, but it has yet to be demonstrated that vampire bats use conditional enforcement to prevent cheating.
2 Values in parentheses reflect a more stringent criteria for evidence of expression: > = 3 SAGE tags or ESTs vs. > = 1; 150% above background vs. > 0% above background; 5% FDR vs. 10% FDR for Affymetrix arrays.
The department is also considering whether to maintain a "preponderance of evidence" standard or a more stringent "clear and convincing evidence" standard for loan forgiveness.
But some groups are pointing to the findings as evidence that the government needs to set a more stringent perchlorate health advisory level.
It is important to consider that these findings were based on a conservative sampling frame that excluded patients without recent evidence of clinical diabetes at baseline and using a more stringent definition of remission than typically used in the literature.
