The phrase "a more stringent assessment" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing evaluations or analyses that require stricter criteria or standards.
Example: "In light of recent findings, we will conduct a more stringent assessment of the project's viability."
Alternatives: "a stricter evaluation" or "a tougher review".
Claimants undergo a more stringent assessment, the Work Capability Assessment, and if assessed as able to undertake work related activity receive a lower level of benefit than those judged unable to work because of sickness, conditional upon their participation in return to work activities [ 9].
Next, we performed a more stringent assessment, in which every of the 87 species was randomly truncated before reconstructing the classification tree.
A more stringent assessment of the potential of these cells is needed for publication in eLife, and the reviewers have provided specific suggestions to address this point below.
The strong association between assessment and the perceived importance of anatomy was underscored by students uniformly calling for a more stringent assessment process.
We accept that our study group was small, and for this reason we could not keep separate training and test datasets for a more stringent assessment of the multivariate models.
An interesting observation was made by senior students, who noted that, although a more stringent assessment procedure might make them study harder, it would not necessarily promote retention of anatomical knowledge.
Sittig and Classen warn of the dangers of the "aggressive" strategy of implementing electronic health records in the US, and call for a much more stringent assessment before they are introduced in order to ensure the safety and efficacy of such a system [ 45].
This is a challenge in view of the fact that decisions with high-risk consequences require greater competence and more stringent assessment [ 18].
Using this more stringent assessment the response rate to reparagen was significantly greater than glucosamine at week 4 (p = 0.05) but not at week 8.
More stringent assessment of lesions at follow-up as evidenced by the fact three out of five evaluated women had a biopsy possibly resulted in a large proportion of failures correctly established.
Taken together, the data presented here not only broaden the understanding of the potential mechanisms of microbicide candidates that result in the enhancement of HIV infection, but also provide a more stringent preclinical assessment tool for the safety evaluation of microbicide candidates, and therefore, have important implications for the development of microbicides.
