The phrase "a more sensitive setting" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing adjustments or configurations that require a higher level of sensitivity, often in contexts like technology, psychology, or environmental settings.
Example: "In order to capture the subtle nuances of the sound, we need to switch to a more sensitive setting on the microphone."
Alternatives: "a heightened sensitivity level" or "a more delicate configuration."
The government is not about to scrap the concept of GDP, but will instead supplement it with a more sensitive set of data about the parts of the UK GDP doesn't reach.
The use of AIMs, as done in the present study, could be a reasonable solution at least to detect obvious (genomic) outliers, but a more sensitive set of AIMs would be needed to detect stratification at the level of more homogeneous populations such as those from Spain mainland.
Based on the BMD values, the genes relating to amino acid glycosylation and tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase may be a more sensitive set of biomarkers than the current single standard biomarker of vitellogenin [ 25].
Newly proposed computerized methods for quantification of JSW may provide a more sensitive set of tools for the assessment of OA progression over time [ 23- 25], but longitudinal studies are needed.
Because we were capturing the whole dynamic range of the Sun, once it dropped away, we'd need a more sensitive camera set-up for night".
This indicates WES tends to produce a larger fraction of error-prone INDELs, while WGS reveals a more sensitive and specific set of INDELs.
Depending on the clinical setting, a more sensitive test (also implying more false-positive results) or a highly specific test (with more false-negative findings) may be preferred.
The window size setting is a more sensitive process in the human and marmoset comparison than that in the mouse and rat comparison because the average genomic divergence between human and marmoset (nongapped noncoding region: ∼10%) is smaller than that between mouse and rat (∼14%).
This method (ssGSEA) can identify coordinated changes of genes belonging to a gene set in a more sensitive way than other over-representation methods (more centered on individual genes) like the ones mentioned above, that could miss some signaling or biological pathways.
Indeed, even at this lower CA125 setting, TFF3 remained a more sensitive indicator of tumour presence than CA125.
