Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "a more robust test" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the strength, reliability, or thoroughness of a test or evaluation method in various contexts, such as scientific research or software development.
Example: "To ensure the accuracy of our results, we need to implement a more robust test that can handle a wider range of variables."
Alternatives: "a stronger test" or "a more thorough test".
Exact(22)
This allows for a more robust test of the relations among the predictor variables and cost system sophistication.
A more robust test of PHA homopolymer production was performed between LSBJ and RSC02 using the methods described above, with two key differences.
Two decades later, a research group led by Lucy Johnston of the University of Canterbury, in New Zealand, performed a more robust test of the idea.
By using a mismatch of faces between study and test to better approximate an eyewitness decision, this experiment provides a more robust test of the mediation involved in facial recognition, which allows for a better evaluation of the relative judgment theory.
We chose a wide range of populations for our studies to provide a more robust test of our hypotheses and show that unethical amnesia affects not only college students but also employed adults.
In order to provide a more robust test, multiple experts could be consulted.
Similar(38)
Given that the assumptions of Peto's paradox are not supported by strong evidence, our review suggests alternative ways for a more robust testing of the correlation (or rather lack of it) between body size and cancer risk.
Since our p values relative to the rank test p values remained nominally significant when using a statistically less powerful but more robust test (data not shown), we can confirm that our small sample size and the deviation from normality do not alter the main findings/conclusions presented in this paper.
Therefore, ICM seems to be a more robust diagnostic test than NPD to distinguish primary from secondary CFTR dysfunction.
A more robust screening test could result from the studies of Wills et al., who measured the size and charge characteristics of proteins leaking through the endothelial sieve in DHF patients (3 ).
Possible departures from the standard neutral model of molecular evolution - potentially revealing demographic events or the existence of selective effects at certain loci - were examined for each locus using the Ewens-Watterson test [ 44, 45] and the Beaumont and Nichols's modified frequentist method [ 9], as well as a more robust Bayesian test [ 12].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com