The phrase "a more rigorous comparison" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the need for a thorough and detailed analysis or evaluation of two or more items, concepts, or data sets.
Example: "In order to draw valid conclusions, we need to conduct a more rigorous comparison of the two studies."
Alternatives: "a more thorough comparison" or "a more detailed comparison".
While this approach requires a larger sample, it would provide more information about the potential differences in factor loadings and underlying factor structures; thus, it allows for a more rigorous comparison of the psychometric properties of monologic tasks between modes.
Because generalized residuals for marginal distributions include variability computations based on the IRT model employed, they provide a more rigorous comparison of observed and model-predicted proportions of students obtaining a particular score on an item than provided in Rogers et al.
Further, the comparison municipality did not continue repeat surveys to provide data across all years as would be needed for a more rigorous comparison.
We considered that testing of specific risk factors requires a more rigorous comparison, namely of offspring of BEN and non-BEN patients from BEN villages.
These modifications permitted a more rigorous comparison of group differences in discrimination ability by ensuring that all other features of the task and stimuli remained constant across all three tasks to eliminate possible confounds.
Monophyly of these three primate louse families has been found in previous molecular studies [ 28, 29]; however, molecular data from the families Hybophthiridae, and Pecaroecidae will be needed for a more rigorous comparison to the morphological study of Kim [ 22].
Verification of this speculation should await more rigorous comparison of expressed OR gene repertoire in diverse groups of squamates.
More rigorous comparison may be needed to differentiate the effects caused by higher dose RT versus lower dose RT, and whether long-course fractionated RT or hypofractionated RT is more clinically effective.
This might be partially due to different sequences of the same genotype submitted by different researchers, along with the increase of the total number of sequences contained in the unigenes that demands more rigorous comparison.
Implementation of validated preclinical assessment in mdx mice 37, 40– 42 that includes in vivo functional end points and histopathology and biochemical markers will facilitate more rigorous comparison of preclinical data from different laboratories and expedite evaluation in the mdx mouse, leading to effective clinical treatments for DMD.
We suggest that, for priority setting decisions at a country level, more rigorous comparisons should be performed as country-specific data become available.
