The phrase "a more reliable effect" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the reliability of different effects or outcomes in a specific context, such as scientific research or product performance.
Example: "After conducting several tests, we found that the new formula produced a more reliable effect than the previous version."
Alternatives: "a more dependable outcome" or "a more consistent result".
The 2-week duration until the repeat questionnaire distribution was decided on based upon discussion with the statistician, and we also wanted to do it sooner in order to obtain a more reliable result on effects post-intervention.
The inclusion of unpublished or inadequately reported data in meta-analyses generally leads to more reliable effect estimates.
This standard was also used to include more trials, resulting in a more reliable pooled effect.
Randomized controlled trials, however, have demonstrated that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has a more reliable local antitumor effect, leading to a lower local tumor progression risk and higher survival rates (6, 7, 8, 9).
Some authors even argued that "the overall 'average' result of a randomised clinical trial is usually a more reliable estimate of treatment effect in the various subgroups examined than are the observed effects in individual subgroups"[ 17].
Any effect of order (due perhaps to acclimatisation to the exercise) might then more neatly partial out of the model and give a more reliable estimate of the effect sizes of the variables under investigation.
Classically, it was felt that a more reliable estimate of drug effect could be obtained with a uniocular trial.
Thus, determination of praecaecal digestibility of nutrients would provide a more reliable picture of the effect of polyphenols on the digestibility of nutrients in the small intestine.
This meta-analysis includes data from more than 2000 patients and therefore provides a more reliable assessment of the effect of UFT on the survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) of the patients with rectal cancer than is available from any of the individual studies.
—William T. Cefalu, MD Editor in Chief, Diabetes Care Meta-analysis is a means of combining data from studies with a common end point with the intention of providing a more reliable estimate of the effect size of some intervention or observation (1).
