Sentence examples for a more pronounced difference from inspiring English sources

Harvesting significantly (p = 0.0011) reduced their number, leading to a significantly higher number of trees in the intermediate diameter class in the control compared to selection plots, with a more pronounced difference for the LRBA plots after harvesting (Table 4).

Nonetheless, the ability to distinguish significant differences in [11C]erlotinib uptake between erlotinib-sensitive and erlotinib-resistant tumors using SUVs suggests that a more pronounced difference would have been observed had a kinetic analysis been performed, and provides an initial proof-of-concept prior to the validation by full kinetic analysis.

A more pronounced difference in prevalence based on one versus two days of sampling was only observed for microscopic detection of P. falciparum, where prevalence increased by 24%.

However, if the number of types is plotted against the cumulative proportion of isolates in the sampled population a more pronounced difference between MLVA, PFGE and spa-sequence typing emerges (Fig. 5).

Since we desired a more pronounced difference in fluorescence emission between sfGFP and frGFP to facilitate directed evolution by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), we explored whether protein quality control associated with either the Tat or SecYEG-mediated export pathways might be capable of yielding a more striking difference in fluorescence for sfGFP and frGFP.

However, a more pronounced difference is observed in CGIs.

This shows a much more pronounced difference between peak systolic strain rates in hypertensive versus healthy patients at maximal resistance when compared to the resting state.

It should be noticed, that an even more pronounced difference might be revealed if ileal specimens obtained by ileoscopy were investigated instead of colonic biopsies.

We found that in the DMR, the methylation level of Fayoumi was higher than Leghorn and the BS-PCR validation result displayed an even more pronounced difference.

When we restricted our analysis to lymph-node negative patients, who are known to have better prognosis than lymph-node positive patients [ 26], we observed an even more pronounced difference in overall survival and relapse-free survival: There, low IGF-I expression defined a subgroup of patients who were at very high risk for recurrence.

Hence, overall, there was a 27-fold more pronounced difference among congeneric species than among conspecific individuals.