The phrase "a more nuanced method of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a refined or sophisticated approach to a particular topic or problem.
Example: "In addressing climate change, we need to adopt a more nuanced method of evaluating the impact of various policies."
Alternatives: "a more sophisticated approach to" or "a more refined technique for".
The trust rejected the claims, but said the station had raised some "significant and valid questions about what constitutes news on 5 Live" and that a "more nuanced method of monitoring the proportion of news output" would be "desirable".
But it said the commercial station had raised some "significant and valid questions about what constitutes news on 5 Live" and said a "more nuanced method of monitoring the proportion of news output" would be "desirable".
Have we worked so hard to be 'heroic leaders' that we now need to unpick some of that to consider a more nuanced method of working?" Leaders in other sectors may have shown a reluctance to deal with this tricky topic but it looks as if higher education is prepared to grasp the nettle.
This I chalked up to cultural differences and the fact that they were transitioning from a Soviet style of education system to more nuanced methods of teaching.
The local programs would, for instance, provide more nuanced methods of dealing with thousands of nonviolent convicts who are automatically sent back to prison, at a cost of $27,000 a year per prisoner, for committing only minor or technical violations of their parole or probation.
Ultimately, orthopaedists will also need to master more nuanced methods of continuous process improvement used routinely in other complex service industries which will in turn depend upon a rich flow of clinical and outcomes information.
9 The simplicity of BMI makes it an attractive choice for clinicians; however, a number of more nuanced methods for quantifying body composition (adipose tissue, in particular) have been developed.
This method provides a more nuanced synthesis of data and, in the current guidelines, the strength of recommendation was established through a formal voting process, in recognition of the fact that in many areas participants had divergent interpretations of the evidence.
We see the major application of this more general method in taking a more nuanced view of the consequences of PTVs, and distinguishing between those likely to be subjected to NMD and those that escape NMD (e.g. many or all PTVs in the last exon of the gene) and may result in gain of function.
We believe it is important to combine these two styles, using "mixed methods" to generate a more nuanced understanding of the real and perceived barriers faced by clinician-scientists in Canada.
This is one of the reasons for our reliance on multiple methods to develop a more nuanced understanding of issues involved and to control for potential social desirability bias.
