The phrase "a more narrow scope of" is not correct; it should be "a narrower scope of." You can use it when discussing the limitations or specific focus of a topic or project.
Example: "The research will focus on a narrower scope of environmental issues to ensure a more in-depth analysis."
Alternatives: "a more limited scope of" or "a tighter scope of".
Primer design by including phylogenetic information has been addressed earlier, but with a more narrow scope.
Now we have a much more narrow scope of possible weather scenarios for the next 3 days, based on much richer past evidence and rather better models than in the 1950s.
An explanation might be the more narrow scope of EQ-5D tapping mainly physical and emotional aspects of HRQL.
Hallinger (2011) points out that "Goals also impact performance by limiting staff attention to a more narrow range of desired ends and scope of activities… They help to clarify what we will do and what we will not do" (2011, p. 129 130).
Although the scholarly writing ranges widely, a much more narrow scope is seen in the actual political-judicial debate.
Your roommate needed someone to search for him, and that's a much more narrow scope.
In contrast, based on our main objective we focus on a more narrow type of bugs by limiting our study scope to concurrency bugs, but provide a broader analysis (comparing concurrency and non-concurrency bugs) taking into consideration several types of these bugs.
It's true that attentional focus does have important effects on creative thinking: a broad scope of attention is associated with the free-floating colliding of ideas, and a narrow scope of attention is more conducive to linear, step-by-step goal attainment.
When I was living on Ottawa, I had a very narrow scope of what dance music was.
Some studies that addressed a narrow scope of service delivery or a niche policy area were excluded from our analysis.
