The phrase "a more impartial evaluation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the need for an assessment or judgment that is fair and unbiased.
Example: "To ensure fairness in the selection process, we need to conduct a more impartial evaluation of all candidates."
Alternatives: "a fairer assessment" or "a less biased review".
This strategy is curious because it is bound to invite comparison between the IARC and those regulatory institutions that have supposedly produced a more impartial evaluation of glyphosate.
We believe the orthopaedic POSSUM scoring system can be used as an adjuvant tool in prioritising surgical need, and allow for a more impartial evaluation when changes to practice are made.
For a more impartial evaluation of surgical timing and its effect on mortality and morbidity, a comparison between patients of equal predicted morbidity and mortality rates at admission and different surgical time points was conducted to exclude confounding factors such as differing physiological compromise and medical comorbidities.
A more impartial school report comes in a new book, "The Coalition Effect 2010-15," edited by Anthony Seldon and Mike Finn.
Anticipating a more "impartial" foreign policy, Lord Malloch Brown said he was happy to be described as an "anti-neocon".
A more impartial way is to assess model quality by comprehensible measures like accuracy, clarity, completeness, conciseness, or consistency.
Impartiality arises not from a shift in motivation but from the difference in the environment so that self-interest coincides with a more impartial perspective.
Peter Railton appeals to the concern people generally have to be able to justify their choices and conduct from a more impartial standpoint.
For all the backstage access and the insanity of the "777" situation, a more impartial film could have wrung a real story out of this tour.
In this sense, it is obvious that the three imputation methods, nr.i, u.i, and b.i, yield a more impartial effect.
In contrast, the radiologist takes a more impartial view and contours the GTV without reference to individual patient characteristics so his confidence in the accuracy of the GTV does not change with the collaborative meeting.
