Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
The phrase "a more frequent pattern" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the occurrence or repetition of a specific pattern in various contexts, such as data analysis, behavior observation, or trend identification.
Example: "In our study, we observed a more frequent pattern of behavior among participants during the evening hours."
Alternatives: "a more common pattern" or "a more regular pattern".
Exact(2)
Consistency was highest for Pattern II which can be explained by the fact that fatty breasts are easier to assess and PII is a more frequent pattern.
Conversely, in a 10-year follow-up study which included 126 COPD patients, Murphy et al. [ 30] observed two distinct patterns of carriage of P. aeruginosa: a more frequent pattern of short-term carriage followed by clearance of the strain in up to half of episodes, and a persistence pattern of the same strain in a quarter of the episodes.
Similar(58)
On the other hand, in our sample we observed chr17 monosomy in 45% of 20 cases (cut-off level of 5%) and the more frequent pattern was the combination of two copies of chr17 with one TP53 copy by cell.
Therefore, a more frequent fractionation pattern with lower doses might be more effective in a therapeutic setting.
The key idea behind the method is to consider the attribute with more frequent patterns as the common attribute and to assign a smaller weight to it.
The recursive process is repeated until no more frequent patterns can be generated.
Repeat steps 2 and 3 until no more frequent patterns are generated. .
However, younger users will tend to have more frequent patterns of use, so there might be greater likelihood of tolerance to some of the effects, whereas older people's use will tend to be sporadic and infrequent, so they may be more likely to experience these effects.
While most of the remaining response patterns showed less than 4% of the sample, there were some more frequent patterns.
Using P-value alone could emphasize small deviations in large samples (e.g. large genomes or more frequent patterns), whereas using the observed/expected ratio alone could lead to over-interpretation of results that lack statistical significance.
Considering somewhat more frequent patterns, 11 sites harbor introns in C. intestinalis, A. thaliana and O. saliva, with the probability of parallel gain ~0.875, and another 12 sites harbor introns only in C. elegans and C. intestinalis, with the probability of parallel gain ~0.8.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com