The phrase "a more effective dose" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to medicine, pharmacology, or any situation where dosage and effectiveness are being discussed.
Example: "After reviewing the patient's response to the medication, the doctor decided to prescribe a more effective dose to achieve better results."
Alternatives: "a stronger dose" or "an improved dosage".
This high dose could be a more effective dose of curcumin supplementation to reduce the diabetes-induced vascular NF-κB p65 and COX-2 upregulation.
100 mg/kg kolaviron was a more effective dose among the doses (100 and 200 mg/kg) investigated in our preliminary study.
100 mg/kg of KV was a more effective dose among the doses (100 and 200 mg/kg) investigated in our preliminary study.
In conclusion, intravenous ramosetron 0.6 mg appears to be a more effective dose than ramosetron 0.3 mg for the prophylaxis of PONV in high-risk patients in the 6 24-hour period after major laparoscopic surgery.
The optimisation approach was further applied to the unapproved dose intense 150 mg m−2 tri-weekly Doc regimen to see if there was a way to give a more effective dose without compromising the safety of the patient.
It seems also clear that LS102, the more specific HRD1 inhibitor (37), produced a more effective, dose-dependent recovery of sarcoglycans.
Radiation biological considerations are based on the assumption that the α/β value for prostate cancer cells is 1.5 Gy, so that a biologically more effective dose could be administered due to hypofractionation without increasing risks of late effects of bladder (α/β = 4.0) and rectum (α/β = 3.9).
What he didn't say -- but what everyone understood -- is that using a higher, more effective dose of Claritin would affect how the drug was described on the label.
The administration of a therapeutically more effective dose of nal-IRI (i.e., 20 mg/kg), while safe and efficacious [35], would have reduced sensitivity in the measurement of FAZA uptake due to potential disappearance of tumor hypoxia following partial or complete response and could also have introduced measurement bias due to rapid tumor volume shrinkage.
Hereby, a biologically more effective dose distribution might be achieved while simultaneously sparing normal tissues.
Since the assumed α/β value of 1.5 Gy for prostate cancer cells is clearly below the α/β values of bladder (α/β value 4.0) and rectum (α/β value 3.9), a radiation biological more effective dose could be administered due to increased single doses without increasing risks of late adverse effects.
