Sentence examples for a more comprehensive group from inspiring English sources
However, elimination of a more comprehensive group appears to be more successful.
While these prior studies are encouraging, a larger study with a more comprehensive group of ALS-mimic disease controls is required in order to verify prior results and determine if CSF cystatin C levels represent a candidate diagnostic biomarker for ALS.
This relatively new hypothesis is not intended to be contradictory to the step-wise model, but merely complementary in explaining the origin of a more comprehensive group of HCC cases and the arising issues in diagnosis and treatment.
Finno-Ugric languages, group of languages constituting much the larger of the two branches of a more comprehensive grouping, the Uralic languages (q.v.).
Data from a larger, more comprehensive group of nephrologists, along with appropriate statistical analysis, would help further elucidate worldwide practices and preferences in dialysis treatment.
Significantly, however, the present ML tree unequivocally places the freshwater eels at the top of the anguilliform phylogenies and they are nested within a more comprehensive monophyletic group (clade A) supported by 100percentnt BP.
While the BCC analysis provides reasonably strong evidence for merging sequences, it clearly does not capture all likely cases, and we therefore turned to similarity to known genes as a more comprehensive means of grouping non-redundant sequences, as described next.
There are some minor discrepancies to our study, but they can be explained well by a new approach of identifying multimorbidity patterns, an unselected patient group and a more comprehensive list of included diagnosis groups in our study.
Future analyses of species richness patterns in watersheds should aim to include a more comprehensive suite of taxonomic groups and should measure richness at multiple spatial scales.
Indeed, the dendrograms obtained, which showed a more comprehensive picture of the grouping between behavioral parameters, demonstrated some relevance of task modality.
Young (2005) suggested a more comprehensive framework identifying 4 groups of factors that influence uptake of evidence by decision-makers: (a) external influences; (b) the context encompassing politics and institutions; (c) the type of evidence, its quality and how it is communicated and; (d) stakeholders, their links and their roles, including legitimacy of researchers [ 10].
