The phrase "a more complicated model" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing a model that has increased complexity compared to another model.
Example: "In our research, we found that a more complicated model provided better predictions than the simpler version."
Alternatives: "a more complex model" or "a more intricate model".
Instead, Dr. Pines and his collaborators have devised a more complicated model based on experimental observations.
If you want to do a more complicated model then that's fine, the idea will be the same.
In a more complicated model the demand for copies would depend not only on the number of copies (our model) but also on the number of competing works.
And that so far is AUDIENCE: I think it's arguable whether it's more parsimonious to say, well, as you go higher, it's linear rather than to actually use a more complicated model.
On the other hand, we are interested in building a more complicated model.
In contrast to [25, 26], in the present paper we study a more complicated model and analyze the numerical stability.
Despite the seemingly apparent complexity regarding how DNA sequences affect nucleosome position, a model (Tillo and Hughes 2009) considering only local G+C% is able to generate a predicted genome-wide nucleosome profile highly similar to the true profile in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, with an overall performance comparable to a much more complicated model (Kaplan et al. 2009).
Following this, the results of a slightly more complicated model are compared with the experimental results found for a prototype MEMS DETF sensor composed of polycrystalline silicon.
And then the interesting part would be more when I replace the simplest model with a slightly more complicated model.
Offering the students a much more complicated model would be rather like giving them that Ferrari to drive.
Is there any point in trying to fit data that can be fitted with three parameters to a much more complicated model with six parameters?
