Suggestions(5)
Exact(60)
The results revealed the following significant correlations: a moderately strong negative correlation between acceptance and hearing disability; a moderate negative correlation between acceptance and symptoms of anxiety and depression and a weak negative correlation between acceptance and readiness to change.
In line with this, we found a moderate negative correlation between Nervousness and Life Satisfaction, while none of the other scales correlated with this dimension.
A moderate negative correlation was found between the stiffness and the PRWE score.
In contrast, between surface temperature and the greenness index a moderate negative correlation was found (r = −0.39; p < 0.01) for a typical dry season day.
Furthermore, we identified a moderate negative correlation ρ = −0.48 [−0.65; −0.26] between the NPM1 level after primary treatment (n) and the time until relapse (d), pointing toward the already known prognostic value of NPM1 levels for relapse incidence [3,4,5,6] (Supplementary Figure S3C).
There was a moderate negative correlation (r2 = 0.12, P < 0.05; Pearson's Product Moment and r2 = 0.23, P < 0.05; ANCOVA) between mean pixel heterogeneity (standard deviation of mean pixel values) of the follicular wall proper (all follicles ≥5 mm in diameter) and serum concentrations of oestradiol after sponge withdrawal.
Mn shows a moderate negative correlation with Zn (r = −0.500, p < 0.05).
In addition, a moderate negative correlation was found between TET2 expression and MS duration [39].
A moderate negative correlation was found between RMET performance and tonic alertness (r τ = −.38, p = .006), and with phasic alertness (r τ = −.34, p = .013).013
∆D avg exhibited a moderate negative correlation (ρ = −0.54, P = 0.04) and ∆V100 showed a strong negative correlation (ρ = −0.8, P = 5.0e−4) with increasing tumor volume.
We also observed that there is a moderate negative correlation between coverage and package size, ρ=−0.43, compared to a very weak positive correlation in how-to-do-it coverage (ρ=0.04).
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com