The phrase "a moderate difference in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing variations or distinctions that are not extreme but still noticeable in a particular context.
Example: "There is a moderate difference in temperature between the two regions during the summer months."
Alternatives: "a slight difference in" or "a reasonable difference in".
The process, called breeding, results in three dunes and occurs only when there is a moderate difference in height.
We will therefore have sufficient power to detect a moderate difference in our secondary outcome.
After 7 h, a reduced fluorescence increase after TNF-alpha application leads to a moderate difference in both conditions).
Three trials showed a moderate difference in ES between active treatment and sham on primary end points (ES ≥0.5) but no trials reported a large difference.
There was a moderate difference in expression (two-fold to 10-fold) of genes involved in cytoskeletal structure and organization in the 25° group.
The QLQ-PAN26 scale showed a "moderate" difference in favor of the gemcitabine alone group at week 9 for the flatulence scale, and at week 17 for the body image, weight, future health and planning activities scales.
A moderate difference was discussed in our preliminary study of the morphology of graphite anode electrode before and after the electrochemical process [14].
This improvement was predominantly attributable to a significant moderate difference in the social functioning domain [8.04 (95% CI 1.89 14.18), Cohen's effect size = 0.49] and a significant small-to-medium difference in the mental health domain [2.46 (95% CI 0.10 4.82), Cohen's effect size = 0.39] (Table 1).
9 23 An effect size of −0.50 indicates an overlap in about 67% and can be considered a moderate difference, whereas −0.80 suggests an overlap in 53% and is considered a large difference.
Aerosolized animals exhibited a moderate difference between right and left lungs in terms of fibrosis, with only 16% of the values above the threshold (instead of 10% for controls and sham animals).
To test the primary null hypothesis of no difference in referral proportions between the control and intervention groups, our sample size of 134 dialysis facilities (67 facilities in each arm), with an estimated 46 patients per facility, achieves 80% power to detect a moderate difference of 3.1% to 4.8% in referral proportions between the two groups at 5% significance level.
