a minimum of three interceptions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a minimum of three interceptions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are specifying a required or expected number of interceptions, such as in sports statistics or game analysis. Example: "To win the game, the defense needs to achieve a minimum of three interceptions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Leaf throws a minimum of three interceptions.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Take a minimum of three days here.

The Guardian - Travel

There should be a minimum of three.

Forbes

"I need a minimum of three strikers.

BBC

Organize a minimum of three references.

WikiHow

The absence of interceptions troubles Ryan, who said he expected a minimum of one a game.

The New York Times - Sports

A minimum of two people is required.

The New York Times - Travel

"There was a minimum of two mistakes".

The Guardian - Sport

It takes a minimum of five years.

The New York Times - Health

"Many charge a minimum of twenty-five dollars.

The New Yorker

Tours last a minimum of two hours.

The Guardian - Travel

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When setting performance goals for a defensive team, use "a minimum of three interceptions" to clearly specify the lower limit for acceptable results.

Common error

Avoid using "a minimum of three interceptions" when you actually mean a target or average. This phrase strictly indicates the least acceptable number, not the ideal or expected number.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a minimum of three interceptions" functions as a quantifying phrase, specifying a lower limit for the number of interceptions. It describes a necessary condition or requirement in a particular context, as evidenced by Ludwig AI's analysis.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

25%

Science

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "a minimum of three interceptions" is grammatically correct and serves to specify a lower limit or required quantity, particularly in the context of sports. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in specifying required numbers. While the phrase is rare, according to its usage frequency analysis, and mostly found in news and wiki sources, it effectively conveys a performance expectation, setting a specific standard. Alternatives like ""at least three interceptions"" and "no fewer than three interceptions"" offer similar meanings with slight variations in formality and emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

At least three interceptions

Uses "at least" instead of "a minimum of", offering a more direct expression of the lower bound.

Need at least three interceptions

Expresses the necessity of achieving at least three interceptions.

No fewer than three interceptions

Employs a more formal tone, emphasizing that the number of interceptions cannot be less than three.

A minimum of three picks

Replaces "interceptions" with the shorter, more informal "picks".

Expect a minimum of three interceptions

Focuses on expectation rather than requirement.

Three or more interceptions

Offers a simple alternative that explicitly states the minimum acceptable quantity and the possibility of exceeding it.

Three interceptions minimum

Rearranges the phrase to place "minimum" at the end for emphasis or stylistic variation.

Three interceptions, at a minimum

Adds a slight emphasis on the minimum requirement by placing "at a minimum" at the end.

Require at least three interceptions

Shifts the focus to the requirement itself, rather than stating the minimum number.

Aim for a minimum of three interceptions

Suggests a goal or target, using "aim for" to soften the requirement.

FAQs

How can I use "a minimum of three interceptions" in a sentence?

You can use "a minimum of three interceptions" to specify the lowest acceptable number of interceptions. For instance, "The coach expects "at least three interceptions" from the defense in each game."

What's the difference between "a minimum of three interceptions" and "at least three interceptions"?

The phrases "a minimum of three interceptions" and "at least three interceptions" are largely interchangeable. "At least" is slightly more direct and common, while "a minimum of" can add a touch of formality.

What can I say instead of "a minimum of three interceptions"?

Alternatives include "no fewer than three interceptions", "three or more interceptions", or "three interceptions minimum", depending on the desired level of formality and emphasis.

Is it correct to say "a minimum of three interception" (singular)?

No, "a minimum of three" requires a plural noun. The correct phrasing is "a minimum of three interceptions". To use the singular, you'd need to say something like "a minimum of one interception".