a minimum of three experiments

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a minimum of three experiments" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when specifying the least number of experiments required for a study or analysis. Example: "To ensure reliable results, we conducted a minimum of three experiments to validate our hypothesis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

Numbers were obtained from the average of a minimum of three experiments.

Plosone

For statistical analysis of RT-PCR results obtained with cellular systems a minimum of three experiments were performed.

Plosone

In parallel, about 5 10 random fields each were considered for quantifying the Map2+/GFAP+differentiated neuronal population among the Dapi+ cells during ES cells differentiation from a minimum of three experiments.

Plosone

Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. of a minimum of three experiments, unless indicated otherwise.

British Journal of Cancer

Error bars denote the standard error from a minimum of three experiments.

eLife

Data are expressed as means ± s.e.m. from a minimum of three experiments.

BMC Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

The sequencing data are the results of a minimum of two experiments.

Plosone

A minimum of two experiments were performed with each compound.

ChemMedChem

A minimum of six experiments per genotype were analyzed.

Genetics

aMean values are from a minimum of eight experiments from three independent preparations.

BMC Biotechnology

The results represented the average of a minimum of five experiments, and a minimum of 500 cells were counted per experiment.

Cell Death and Disease

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a minimum of three experiments", clearly define what constitutes an 'experiment' in your methodology to avoid ambiguity. This is particularly important in scientific reporting.

Common error

Avoid assuming that readers understand the experiments were independent. Explicitly state "a minimum of three independent experiments" to ensure clarity and rigor, especially in scientific contexts where independence is crucial.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a minimum of three experiments" functions as a quantifying expression, specifying a lower limit for the number of experiments conducted. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a correct and usable phrase in written English, often used in scientific or technical contexts to ensure rigor and reliability.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "a minimum of three experiments" is a grammatically sound and widely accepted expression, particularly in scientific writing, for specifying a lower bound on the number of experimental trials. As highlighted by Ludwig AI, it serves to emphasize the reliability and validity of research findings. While alternatives like "at least three experiments" exist, maintaining clarity and explicitly stating experiment independence are crucial for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

at least three experiments

Replaces "a minimum of" with "at least", which is a direct synonym and maintains the core meaning of requiring a certain threshold.

three or more experiments

Indicates the quantity using "or more", implying that the number of experiments can be three or higher.

no fewer than three experiments

Emphasizes the lower bound requirement with a slightly more formal tone using "no fewer than".

three independent experiments, at least

Reorders the phrase for emphasis and adds "at least" for clarity, confirming a lower limit.

a minimum of three separate experiments

Specifies that the experiments should be separate, reinforcing the need for independent trials.

three independent trials, at least

Substitutes "experiments" with "trials", a synonym, and specifies independence and the lower bound.

a minimum of three repetitions

Replaces "experiments" with "repetitions", focusing on the act of repeating a process.

three experiments, minimally

Adds "minimally" to emphasize the minimum requirement after stating the number of experiments.

a minimum of three experimental runs

Replaces "experiments" with "experimental runs", specifying the process of running an experiment.

at a minimum, three experiments

Positions "at a minimum" at the beginning for emphasis, followed by the number of experiments required.

FAQs

How can I use "a minimum of three experiments" in a sentence?

You can use "a minimum of three experiments" to specify the least number of experiments required for a study or analysis. For example: "To ensure reliable results, we conducted "a minimum of three experiments" to validate our hypothesis."

What is a good alternative to "a minimum of three experiments"?

Alternatives include "at least three experiments", "three or more experiments", or "no fewer than three experiments", depending on the desired level of formality and emphasis.

Is it better to say "a minimum of three experiments" or "at least three experiments"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct and largely interchangeable. "A minimum of three experiments" is slightly more formal, while "at least three experiments" is more common in everyday language. The choice depends on the context and desired tone.

What does it mean to conduct "a minimum of three independent experiments"?

Conducting "a minimum of three independent experiments" means that you have performed at least three separate experimental trials, each designed and executed in a way that does not influence the others. This ensures that the results are reliable and not due to a single, anomalous occurrence.