Sentence examples for a methodology of discovery from inspiring English sources
Advocates of a methodology of discovery usually rely on a distinction between different justification procedures, justification involved in the process of generating new knowledge and justification involved in testing it.
But the nature of how the discovery came about led some to questions about the methodologies used behind the scenes.
In these approaches, the distinction between the contexts of discovery and the context of justification is challenged because the methodology of discovery is understood to play a justificatory role.
The methodology of discovery has sometimes been characterized as a form of justification that is complementary to the methodology of testing (Nickles 1984, 1985 , 1989.
Other approaches to the methodology of discovery are directly concerned with the procedures involved in devising new hypotheses.
For advocates of this version of the methodology of discovery, it is the task of philosophy of science to characterize sets of constraints and methodological rules guiding the complex process of prior-to-test evaluation of hypotheses.
The methodology of discovery is only weakly normative in the sense that the strategies for the discovery of mechanisms that have been identified so far may prove useful in future biological research.
But many advocates of methodologies of discovery regard the context of pursuit as an integral part of the process of justification.
Advocates of the view that there are methodologies of discovery use the term "logic" in the narrow sense of an algorithmic procedure to generate new ideas.
Others focused on methodologies of discovery that could either allow one to rationally reconstruct why something was discoverable at a given time (Nickels 1985) or to explain why a new hypothesis is considered promising and worthy of further investigation (Schaffner 1993).
