The phrase "a memo arguing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a memorandum that presents a case or viewpoint on a particular issue or topic.
Example: "The team submitted a memo arguing for increased funding for the project based on its potential benefits."
Alternatives: "a memo advocating" or "a memo contending".
In 2002, Republican consultant Frank Luntz wrote a memo arguing that Republicans start using the latter term.
The author of a memo arguing for a government takeover of development of the nation's 5G mobile network has been removed from the National Security Council staff.
Sidley Austin, a law firm in Chicago hired by a pro-business civic group, has circulated a memo arguing that the clause refers only to benefits already earned — not to the rate of accrual in the future.
It would have been, Bang!" After 9/11, Drake wrote a memo arguing that ThinThread ought to be "put into the fight," and sent it up the chain of command.
At the time, he wrote a memo arguing that the "limits on executive compensation, splitting the role of chairman and C.E.O. and efforts to impose shareholder referendums on matters that have been the province of boards should be resisted".
More than just a memo arguing that it is legal to kill an American citizen siding with the enemy in times of war, we need to clarify the legal definition of war, its battlefields and its combatants.
Earlier this summer, James Damore, a Google engineer, was fired for writing a misogynistic memo arguing that his company's diversity initiatives were a misguided waste of time.
Geoff Garin, a Democratic pollster who worked for the Sink campaign, put out a defensive memo arguing that Obamacare was, in fact, a net positive for his candidate, helping her to close the gap in a seat that was always the Republicans' to lose.
Plans to cancel the Corvette -- justified by fewer than 4,000 total sales in the first two model years -- were rescinded late in 1954 after Zora Arkus-Duntov, the car's swashbuckling guardian angel and its first chief engineer, risked his career with an impassioned memo arguing that a high-performance sports car would make all Chevrolets more appealing.
In late October of 2009, Kidney circulated a long memo arguing that the S.E.C. should consider charging Paulson & Company, John Paulson himself, and Paolo Pellegrini, who was the hedge fund executive who worked on the Abacus deal.
That's notable, because perhaps Barr's biggest liability at his confirmation hearing earlier this year was that he had written a 2017 memo arguing that Mueller's obstruction-of-justice probe wasn't warranted in the first place.
