The phrase "a mean population of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in statistical or scientific contexts when referring to the average value of a population in a study or analysis.
Example: "The study revealed a mean population of 150 individuals per square kilometer in the surveyed area."
Alternatives: "an average population of" or "a typical population of".
"New York and Los Angeles at any given time have had four or five, but London at the time had a mean population of 170,000," said Arntfield, adding that in megacities like New York and Los Angeles the per-capita equivalent would be about 80 or 90 per city.
Furthermore, the 41 areas meeting this criterion are also relatively small metropolitan areas having a mean population of 203,919.
It has been suggested that they had a mean population of about 2,000, but many were much smaller than 1,000, and the largest, Edinburgh, probably had a population of over 10,000 at the beginning of the era.
It has been suggested that they would have had a mean population of about 2,000, but many would be much smaller than 1,000 and the largest, Edinburgh, probably had a population of over 10,000 by the end of the era.
It has been suggested that they would have had a mean population of about 2,000, but many would be much smaller than 1,000 and the largest, Edinburgh, probably had a population of more than 10,000 by the end of the era.
It has been suggested that they would have had a mean population of about 2,000, but many would be much smaller than 1,000 and the largest, Edinburgh, probably had a population of over 10,000 at the beginning of the modern era and by 1750, with its suburbs it had reached 57,000.
Raw scores were transformed into standardized T-scores reflecting a mean population distribution of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
A general quotient (GQ) was then calculated with a mean population value of 100 and a standard deviation of 12.
A sub-quotient for each related subscale was calculated with a mean population value of 100 and a standard deviation of 16.
Lower income neighborhoods were a mixture of rural and urban with a mean population density of 12,153 per square mile (median 689 per square mile).
A properly targeted instrument would have a mean population value of zero logits, which is also where the items of the scale are centred.
