Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
a maximum of with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "a maximum of with" is not correct and does not make sense in written English.
It seems to be a combination of two phrases that do not logically fit together. Example: "We can accommodate a maximum of 50 guests at the event."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
For example, holding the jack of clubs but not the jack of spades is "with one," holding four jacks but not the ace of trumps is "with four," and so on to a maximum of "with 11" in a suit-trump game (this is possible because the two cards of the skat count as part of one hand) or a maximum of "with four" at grand.
Encyclopedias
Analysis demonstrated that overall the geometric bias of the marker tracking method ranges from 0 to a maximum of (with a mean of and a standard deviation of ) voxels.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
This protects money held with a bank or building society, up to a maximum of £85,000 with each institution that holds a separate banking licence.
News & Media
Most standard travel insurance policies pay out a maximum of £200-£300, with only 11% of policies covering £500 or more, according to Gocompare.com.com
News & Media
The fundamental measure ranges from a minimum of 60.95 to a maximum of 99.75 with an average value of 83.13.
Science
T Arietis is a semiregular variable star that ranges in magnitude from a minimum of 11.3 to a maximum of 7.5 with a period of 317 days.
Wiki
R Arietis is a Mira variable star that ranges in magnitude from a minimum of 13.7 to a maximum of 7.4 with a period of 186.8 days.
Wiki
U Arietis is another Mira variable star that ranges in magnitude from a minimum of 15.2 to a maximum of 7.2 with a period of 371.1 days.
Wiki
VLA (mm−1) varied from a minimum value of 1.37 to a maximum of 10.76, with a mean of 3.17.
Science
The polymorphic band percentages ranged from 16 to a maximum of 68 with an average polymorphism level of 43 %.
Science
Each item is scored from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 1, with a maximum score of 20 points.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When indicating an upper limit, ensure that the preposition 'of' is followed by a specific value or noun phrase, not another preposition like 'with'. For instance, use "a maximum of 10 items" instead of "a maximum of with..."
Common error
Avoid combining "a maximum of" with another preposition such as "with". This creates grammatically incorrect phrases. Instead, clarify what the maximum applies to directly after 'of'.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "a maximum of with" is grammatically incorrect as it combines "a maximum of", which indicates an upper limit, with the preposition "with" in a way that doesn't form a coherent phrase. As Ludwig AI indicates, the combination creates an ungrammatical structure.
Frequent in
Science
33%
News & Media
33%
Encyclopedias
33%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "a maximum of with" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. Ludwig AI identifies this combination as flawed. Correct alternatives include phrases like "up to a maximum of" or simply ""a maximum of"" followed by a specific noun phrase. Although some instances appear in various sources, this does not validate the proper usage of this ungrammatical phrase. Ensure that you use appropriate grammar to clearly express limits or upper bounds in your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Up to a maximum of
Adds "up to" for clarity, indicating a limit that may not always be reached. Corrects the syntax.
A limit of
Directly specifies a boundary or upper constraint.
Maximum of
A shorter, more concise way to express the upper limit.
No more than
Emphasizes that the value cannot exceed a certain point.
At most
Indicates the highest possible quantity or degree.
A ceiling of
Suggests a metaphorical upper boundary that cannot be surpassed.
The upper limit of
Formal way to specify an imposed restriction.
A maximum value of
Technical and emphasizes an explicit upper numerical bound.
Not exceeding
Highlights the condition that a value stays below a defined level.
To the maximum extent of
Stresses utilizing something up to its full permissible degree.
FAQs
How should I correctly use "a maximum of" in a sentence?
Follow "a maximum of" with a noun phrase that specifies the limit. For example, "The room can hold "a maximum of" 50 people" is correct.
What are some alternatives to the incorrect phrase "a maximum of with"?
Instead of "a maximum of with", use phrases like "up to a maximum of", "a limit of", or simply "maximum of".
Is it grammatically correct to say "a maximum of with"?
No, the phrase "a maximum of with" is grammatically incorrect. It is better to say ""a maximum of"" followed by a specific quantity or item.
Can you provide examples of how to properly use "a maximum of" in different contexts?
Correct examples include "There is "a maximum of" three attempts per quiz", or "The grant provides "a maximum of" $5000 per project". These avoid the incorrect use of "with".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested