The maximum assessment on employers would be equal to $400 multiplied by the total number of employees.
The optimal alternative for the interval target-based full multiplicative form has the maximum assessment value and is calculated utilizing Eq. (31): A_{text{IT - MF}}^ = left{ {A_{i} left| {,mathop {hbox{max} }limits_{i} bar{U}_{i} } right.} right}, (46 in which "IT-MF" stands for "interval target-based full multiplicative form".
The optimal alternative based on this technique has the maximum assessment value (Hafezalkotob and Hafezalkotob 2015): A_{text{T - RS}}^ = left{ {A_{i} left| {,mathop {hbox{max} }limits_{i} Y_{i} } right.} right}, (6 in which "T-RS" stands for "target-based ratio system".
The optimal alternative based on the interval target-based ratio system has the maximum assessment value and is determined using Eq. (31): A_{text{IT - RS}}^ = left{ {A_{i} left| {,mathop {hbox{max} }limits_{i} bar{Y}_{i} } right.} right}, (41 in which "IT-RS" stands for "interval target-based ratio system".
The total number of follow up assessments was 141, with a maximum of 5 assessments per patient.
Participants in our study had a maximum of four assessment points at 2 monthly intervals: less intensive than some other trials.
Thus, patients were examined at 2-monthly intervals over a period of 2 years, yielding a maximum of 12 assessments.
This score, constrained between zero and one, was derived from a maximum possible number of assessment indicators for each child, with 5 indicators for all children, and extra indicators for children diagnosed with malaria (4), pneumonia (4) and diarrhea/dehydration (2) (Additional file 1).
Intra-rater reliability on two days and was examined by comparing results from the two assessment sessions, with a maximum of three working days between the assessment sessions.
Based on these relationships, assessment of a maximum volume can be followed by estimates of the peak discharge and the run-out distance.
Each assessment lasted a maximum of five minutes.
