The phrase "a massive appropriations" is not correct in English.
It should be "massive appropriations" or "a massive appropriation" depending on the context. You can use it when discussing large amounts of funds allocated for a specific purpose, typically in a governmental or organizational context.
Example: "The government announced a massive appropriation for infrastructure development in the upcoming fiscal year."
Alternatives: "large funding" or "significant allocation".
In an interview, Mr. Martinez said: "A massive appropriations bill is not the appropriate place to make foreign policy decisions.
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky). is trying to use a massive appropriations bill to loosen campaign finance rules.
The problem with today's bill is that without any public debate or congressional consideration, legislative language was slipped into a massive appropriations bill to eliminate Free Choice Vouchers.
It then passed it, 89-8, along with a massive appropriations measure that includes funding for transportation programs, the VA, housing programs and military construction.
Huffington had voted against a massive appropriations bill passed by the then-Democratic House, which financed the hiring of 700 new guards, but voted for other bills beefing up border security.
Today, Congress has passed a massive appropriations bill -- funding the entirety of the federal government for the rest of the year -- and it includes a number of legislative provisions that have never been considered by a congressional committee or debated on the House or Senate floors.
The outlook dimmed further in recent weeks after Republican leaders shifted nearly $20 billion from the massive appropriations bill that funds NIH and a host of politically sensitive education and welfare programs to other spending measures.
Congress has not been eager to fund a full border wall, or to pony up the massive appropriations that would be needed to drastically increase staffing for Border Patrol and ICE.
With the intensification of the U.S. military and economic push in Colombia, we sadly can anticipate more such violence against peaceful actors in Colombia in order to make Colombian land secure for massive appropriation and exploitation.
The NIH funding is part of a massive, 4000-page omnibus appropriation bill that was still being finalized by harried congressional staffers.
What might have started out as a tasteful tribute — and I'm giving them a massive benefit of the doubt here — ended up as a tacky, tasteless re-appropriation of something sacred.
