The phrase "a manuscript that could" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the potential or possibilities of a manuscript in various contexts, such as publishing, research, or creative writing.
Example: "The editor was impressed by a manuscript that could change the way we understand modern literature."
Alternatives: "a manuscript with the potential to" or "a manuscript capable of".
As Weinberg read about the early years of Nazi Germany, he began to hear about a manuscript that could change the course of his research.
Though Kant never completed a manuscript that could be put forward as a publication, the various notes, sketches, and drafts on topics in physics that he was working on intensively during this time (especially after 1796) were gathered together over a century after his death and published as his so-called Opus postumum.
In addition there are specific concerns raised by the reviewers that we feel would require substantial experimental work, beyond the normal we suggest for a manuscript that could be returned with revisions.
It is a set of photographs of manuscripts that could not be published in the Soviet Union, and one look at it is enough for the older man to grasp the gravity of the crime that is being confessed.
Dr. Unschuld has also collected 1,100 antique manuscripts that could give clues to how medicine was practiced at China's grass-roots level.
Ms. Van Deusen, who enlisted Mr. Foster's help, said that some of Mr. Livingston's other descendants retained letters and manuscripts that could potentially gain some value if he was established as the author of the famous verse.
The consortia would be pleased to hear from research groups with plans for manuscripts that could be included within the list of companion papers.
Mr. Ede also pioneered the sale of single manuscript pages that could be framed, his son said, meaning that a manuscript with damaged pages could become a valuable new product.
By attempting to exercise tight control over Freud's historical image, his most loyal followers - the editors of "Origins," Ernest Jones and those who have restricted access to his letters and manuscripts - have created a situation that could seriously damage his reputation in the public eye.
