Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "a majority of just" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be an incomplete thought and lacks context to determine its intended use.
Example: "A majority of justices agreed on the ruling."
Alternatives: "most of the justices" or "the majority of justices".
Exact(54)
(The Republicans have a majority of just two).
But the governing coalition rules by a majority of just one.
Their candidate, Iain Stewart, was elected in 2010 with a majority of just over 5,000.
In the 150-seat House of Representatives, the coalition has a majority of just one seat.
Phillips entered parliament in 2010 with a majority of just under 20,000.
In Stockton South Wharton he has a majority of just 332.
In the event Richard did, with a majority of just 559 over Labour.
That gave Labour a majority of just over 5,000, less than half its previous level.
But then came the hung parliament, with a majority of just one.
Labour would have 225 MPs and the Tories 327 - giving David Cameron a majority of just four.
It was held by Lorely Burt with a majority of just 175 votes over the Tories in 2010.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com