The phrase "a major contribution for" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct preposition to use is "to" instead of "for."
Example: "Her research made a major contribution to the field of medicine."
Alternatives: "a significant contribution to" or "a substantial contribution to".
The result is a must-read text poised to make a major contribution for decades to come.
Also making a major contribution for the Rangers was goalie Mike Richter, who stopped a penalty shot in the first period to preserve a one-goal lead.
More than a third of the 1,191 teachers surveyed said they have had less time to teach art and design over the past five years (across all key stages), with 93% pointing to the English baccalaureate as a major contribution for the sidelining of these subjects.
Conversely, uncited papers mean that they do not provide a major contribution for other scientists (see, e.g. Schmitz 2008 and the literature cited therein).1 The degree of significance attributed to citations is, however, also subject to criticism, which is why some authors reject the use of citation metrics as a matter of principle (e.g. MacRoberts and MacRoberts 1996).
We believe that these findings constitute a major contribution for the long term storage of somatic cells from animals threatened from extinction.
The P.alba transcriptome database obtained and characterized here represents a major contribution for Prosopis sp. genomics and genetics.
Such effect is similar to that described by Wasserman et al. [ 28] for the incremental effort test and may indicate a major contribution of the anaerobic metabolism for the exercise with the involved limb.
There is clear genetic evidence for a major contribution of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) to dioxin toxicity.
However, thapsigargin alone did not alter [Ca2+]i and did not further exacerbate DCD, arguing against a major contribution of intracellular store depletion for the observed glutamate-induced DCD.
Identification of two muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligases, MuRF-1 and MAFbx/atrogin-1, in a large number of animal models of atrophy [ 7, 8] has been used to provide an argument for a major contribution of the UPP in muscle wasting, such that these genes are now measured as surrogate indicators of UPP activation.
However, our histomorphometric study as well as a study in which we performed computed tomography (CT) scans of the facet, i.e., zygapophyseal joints provided no evidence for a major contribution of capsular ankylosis or extraarticular osteophytes in AS facet joints [ 4].
