Sentence examples for a magnification range from inspiring English sources

Slides of liver, intestine, kidney, and gill were examined at a magnification range 100 1000x by light microscopy.

The samples were viewed in a Jeol JEM-2100 electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV and a magnification range of 1,500× to 4,000×.

The components of this system included a 3.0 megapixel CMOS digital camera (Clemex Technologies, Inc. Longueuil, Canada) mounted on a Leica Z16 APO monocular zoom lens 16:1 with a magnification range of 0.57 - 9.2x.

Digital images of stained colon whole mounts were captured using a customized image acquisition system (North Central Instruments, Inc., Plymouth, MN) consisting of a 3.0 megapixel CMOS digital camera (Clemex Technologies, Inc. Longueuil, Canada) mounted on a Z16 APO monocular zoom lens 16:1 with a magnification range of ×0.57 9.2 (Leica Microsystems, Inc., Bannockburn, IL).

For each lesion the location and shape of the defect and the microwear features of the enamel, dentin, dentinal tubules, and pulp were analyzed and photographed at a magnification ranging from 25x to 5000x.

The slide was viewed on a Nikon Diaphot inverted microscope with a 40 to 400× magnification range to identify the tardigrades to genus, species, or type.

Under a dissecting microscope (with 10-80X magnification range), two to three individuals per morphospecies per site per zone (planktonic/benthic) were selected for barcoding, for a total of 283 specimens.

Combining the large field of view with the high magnification range in an SEM, it was also possible to successfully study large-scale phenomena, such as crack propagation.

All measures for the microscope navigation and eye movement data were analysed with multi-level analysis with expertise-level as a predictor, except for proportion of time per magnification range, stimulus coverage per magnification range, and revisits to DRAs, which were analysed with a Kruskal Wallis test due to their non-normal distributions.

Visual encapsulation was measured as the average magnification a time-weighted average of all magnifications used by a participant in a single case and the proportion of the time on task per magnification range.

The consistency of the image plane height across the magnification range testified the zoom capability.