Sentence examples for a lower sum of from inspiring English sources
The phrase "a lower sum of" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used when discussing amounts, particularly in financial or mathematical contexts, to indicate a smaller total or quantity. Example: "After reviewing the expenses, we found that a lower sum of $500 would be more manageable for our budget."
YAHA has a lower sum of error rates for ten of the datasets, versus two for BWA-SW.
Also, fitting the model to age-specific fertility rate data of Greece in Figure 4, it is again shown that the skew-logistic has a lower sum of square of residuals.
A comparatively lower sum of variances scaled by the square of the summed means (hereafter the variance CV) among variables characterizing an ecological function indicates higher stability, since it implies a dampening of response to a common set of environmental perturbations.
Whereas a comparatively lower sum of co-variances scaled by the square of the summed means (hereafter the co-variance CV) among these variables also indicates higher stability since it implies that different facets of an ecological function synchronize less over time, whereby minimizing the risk of functional breakdown.
McDonald's paid corporation tax at 19.25% on the lower sum of £341m, resulting in a total tax bill of £65m.
Induction of endometriosis in an inflamed peritoneal cavity resulted in fewer lesions and significantly lower sum of lesion surface area per mouse in the TM-treated group.
I hope that this success can be repeated". The Manet campaign was undoubtedly praiseworthy, although it involved having to raise the substantially lower sum of £7.8m.
Through comparing two infeasible solutions, the chosen is the one with the lower sum of constraint violation.
However, Fig. 8a, b clearly show Moonraker produced more clustering (i.e., lower sum of weight gaze covariance) on fewer clusters than Touch of Evil.
Unsurprisingly those FGR+ infants were lighter and thinner at birth as demonstrated by the lower BMI/birth weight z-scores and the lower sum of skinfolds at day 3 compared to FGR− infants.
In contrast, the residual systematic variance in harmony ratings was due to greater hue similarity (i.e., fewer Munsell hue steps apart) (13.7%) and lower overall saturation (i.e., lower sum of the Munsell chroma coordinates) (6.4%).
