Sentence examples for a lower performance in from inspiring English sources

Regarding muscular fitness, rural young people had a better performance in handgrip strength (mean difference = 0.8 kg), bent arm hang (mean difference = 2.3 s), and a lower performance in sit-ups in 30 s (mean difference = 0.9 s) (all p < 0.001), compared to their urban peers.

However, this algorithm has been presented by using an approximated l 0-norm function for which we will later show that it achieves a lower performance in sparse signal recovery at low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) or for a small number of pulses compared to the SLIM algorithm.

The authors found that children with ASD+ADHD had a lower performance in all of the adaptive functions except home/school living than children with ADHD [Mattard-Labrecque et al., 2013].

Lung scan for PE diagnosis demonstrates a lower performance in elderly due to frequent underlying pulmonary diseases (Righini et al 2000), and finally, the frequency of renal impairment in elderly patients limits the use of CT-scan.

This is also consistent with our data that show a lower performance in the digits forward task that measures short-term memory, but no deficits for digits backward task that is related to working memory capacity.

Boxplots in Figure 3 highlight how (1000 + 1000 -EA has a lower performance in finding better solutions compared to the other populations, although the distribution of its final fitness values is the only one in which all runs cross the threshold of relative improvement of 0.78.

Girls tend to have a lower performance, both in primary school and in COBET.

Thus, design compromises can lead to a hybrid and reconfigurable WiNoC project or even a lower performance project in order to attain energy consumption gains.

Plants in small and isolated populations often have a lower performance than those in larger, interconnected populations due to increased inbreeding (Ellstrand and Elam, 1993; Fischer and Matthies, 1998; Kéry and Matthies, 2004).

These genetic links are also evidenced in extreme groups (e.g. Hayiou-Thomas, Harlaar, Dale & Plomin, 2010), with genetic correlations varying from.44 to.64 in a lower performance group and.52 in a higher performance group (Bishop, 2001; Haworth, Kovas et al., 2009; Haworth, Dale & Plomin, 2009).

A lower performance is provided in the case of using uniform sensor distribution.