Sentence examples for a lower level of performance from inspiring English sources

The engineers actually went back to their virtual prototype and redesigned the club to have a lower level of performance.

Inward focusing (daydreams, preoccupations) is associated with a lower level of performance whether outward focusing, together with inward monitoring, seems to partly protect runners from "hitting the wall".

High scores indicate a lower level of performance for both scales.

A lower level of performance was also reported in prior categorization training studies for nonnative compared with native sounds, even when using intensive high-variability training procedures over prolonged training periods (Lively et al. 1993; Callan et al. 2003; Golestani and Zatorre 2004).

"The typical citizen drops down to a lower level of mental performance as soon as he enters the political field," the economic theorist Joseph Schumpeter wrote, in 1942.

Mr Postol says that while he cannot say what the performance of Iron Dome was in Operation Pillar of Defence, "all the available evidence unambiguously indicates a drastically lower level of performance than the 84% claimed by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF)." His view is that the successful hit rate on incoming warheads could be as low as 5-10%.

Therefore, the INST group, with a lower level of baseline plyometric performance, might have improved in CMJ test and the hurdle jump test earlier and with a smaller amount of training as compared to what might have been necessary for the subjects exercising on a stable surface.

Especially for the backhand net shots it is assumed that experts exert high pressure on the racket handle within a short period of time to utilize the elasticity of the racket whereas athletes on lower level of performance tend to maintain grip forces over a longer period during the final phase of the smash.

Second, post-hoc analyses showed that the emotional distraction had an impairing effect only on LOC3, with the emotional distracters being associated with lower level of performance compared to both neutral (p<0.005) and scrambled distracters (p<0.0002).

This does not however explain the lower level of performance by Group B, nor does it explain the low use of the online material in Year 1 by Group B. The cause of these results is unclear.

Compared to younger observers, older observers required a lower level of noise in order for performance to drop to 90% (30 versus 49% contrast).