The phrase "a lower correlation of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the relationship or association between two variables, indicating that the relationship is weaker than another.
Example: "The study found a lower correlation of stress levels to productivity compared to previous research."
Alternatives: "a weaker correlation of" or "a diminished correlation of".
The lowest correlation of grass at the daily scale shows a lower correlation of Pasture_ET with meteorological factors.
In addition, examination of the admission only dataset indicated a lower correlation of +0.21.
One of the biological replicates for the "Old" time point had a lower correlation of approximately 0.7 and was excluded from global analyses to maintain stringency.
IHSVoight however was uncorrelated with top 1% sites and showed a lower correlation of 0.228 among the top 0.1% sites as compared to iHS.
Stone et al. [ 38] reported a moderate to high correlation of both the tibial plateau width and meniscal length/width with body height, but a lower correlation of these with body weight in a mixed cohort of men and women.
In the Tutoring Condition, moreover, there was a lower correlation of students' prior aptitude test scores and their final achievement scores, indicating that students of all aptitude levels had the potential to reach higher levels of learning.
This may also underlie the difference from our findings and the fact that in our study of patients with SIRS this score had a lower correlation to 28-day mortality (AUC of 0.75 compared with 0.82 in the original study).
As a result, a lower correlation betweenpercentt of tubular injured area and Kim-1 levels was found (r = 0.46).
If this is the case, we expect a lower correlation or nil correlation of the issuance of debt instruments and the issuance of capital instruments.
However, the direct technique produced a lower correlation (R2 = of 0.921) compared to the indirect one (R2 = 0.987) and also showed a higher variation in terms of measured CO concentration again compared to the indirect technique.
Both heterozygosity estimates fluctuated more over the genome compared to GD_IBD, reflecting a lower correlation between values of adjacent marker intervals for the heterozygosity estimates (Hexp_AVG: r = 0.23; Hexp_HAP2: r = 0.28; GD_IBD: r = 0.64).
