Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a low hazards" is not correct in English.
It should be "low hazards" or "a low hazard." You can use it when describing a situation, environment, or activity that presents minimal risk or danger.
Example: "The construction site was deemed safe due to the presence of low hazards."
Alternatives: "minimal risks" or "low risk".
Similar(60)
"It may be a low hazard, but it's not completely benign".
Nonetheless, a low bioavailability/bioaccessibility fraction should not be interpreted as representing a low hazard potential.
The first group has a low hazard (type 1, 29.1% of the ever-overeducated in the sample) while the second group is much more likely to exit overeducation quickly (type 2, 70.9%).
Chelsea, who have now won just two of their 18 top-flight games at Loftus Road, could have gone ahead inside the opening four minutes, but debutant Rangers keeper Julio Cesar made a fine block to keep out a low Hazard strike after a swift break.
PDD-guided TUR also exhibited a low hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.69, 95 % CI [0.53 0.77]).
A low hazard ratio was seen for the combination of high referral ratio and high detection rate (0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.94 to 0.99); hereafter referred to as group 1 of the study population).
This factor was worse (i.e. giving a high hazard ratio: 1.05 in hormone therapy, 2.88 in chemotherapy, and 2.07 in chemotherapy plus hormone therapy) in univariate analysis, and better (giving a low hazard ratio: 0.64 in hormone therapy, 0.8 in chemotherapy, and 0.66 in chemotherapy plus hormone therapy) in multivariate analysis.
Legislation is justified even for a chemical preparation with a low hazard, if it can pose a risk to the environment through being released in sufficiently large quantities.
Though the Army Corps of Engineers classified Lees Pond as a low-hazard dam, there was still a small possibility that the dam could flood downtown businesses if it were to collapse or be overwhelmed by water.
As type 2 s exit the pool of overeducated individuals, the probability that a random individual exits overeducation declines, as she is more and more likely to be a low-hazard, type 1 individual.
Concerning smaller meteorites that hit the ground, they are a very low hazard and no human was ever reported being killed by a small meteorite (while one person was missing after Tunguska).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com