Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a low goal" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an objective or target that is not very ambitious or challenging.
Example: "Setting a low goal for the project may lead to underwhelming results and missed opportunities for growth."
Alternatives: "a modest goal" or "a minimal target."
Exact(9)
So I just went in there having a low goal, quarter-finals, and then building on that goal match by match, and that's literally how I took it.
Half an hour later he drew the Dockers level by accepting a handball from Michael Barlow, then off one step drilling a low goal from about 35m, less than 10 seconds before the final change.
After the zenith of Euro 2000, the 2002 World Cup was labelled a freak, with a low goal ratio ostensibly attributable to three things: the climate, the early start to the tournament which drained the game's great attacking heroes of their superpowers, and the oddball presence of so many minnows in the later stages.
Top performers reasoned, "I'm not going to make goal this year, so the best strategy is to hold back so I get a low goal next year". An allocation that failed to acknowledge differences in territory opportunity created unintentional stretch goals for the company's best performers, alienating this critical group.
With such a low goal for the Mini, this sounds like the right approach.
They set a low goal of raising $10,000 in the next seven days, and half of the proceeds will go toward different youth sports foundations in Finland and Colombia while the other half will go toward game development.
Similar(51)
Steele then made an important late save by diving to keep out a low goal-bound drive from Joe Bennett to ensure Blackburn took a point.
A low-goal player can expect to spend about $20,000 a year to continue playing the game regularly, Mr. McNamara said.
"We come every weekend," said Mr. Dweck, a Glen Cove resident and a low-goal polo player at the Meadowbrook Polo Club.
That bill, the Waxman-Markey bill, proposes to cap U.S. greenhouse gas emissions at about 3percentt below their 1990 level by 2020 -- a ridiculously low goal given that America is the country most responsible for the warming gases in the atmosphere today and remains one of the world's leading carbon polluters.
It's a lacklustre but not ridiculously low goal when compared with other developed economies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com