Exact(9)
Adolescents from non-standard families presented worse scores in the Risk domain, with a low effect size.
The same comparison was not statistically significant (p = .256) with a low effect size (η 2 part = .18) in the healthy volunteers.
Differences were also noted in academic achievement, with highest scores in those from families with a high LE (whether paternal, maternal or highest) and where the maternal OSC was I – II, in both cases with a low effect size.
Differences between non-VGA and VGA achieved moderate effect sizes for the SOGS-total score and the DSM-total criteria, and the other pairwise comparison achieved a low effect size.
With regard to the child report, observed sex differences on the KINDL were significant in that girls reported a lower QoL than boys, but all differences had a low effect size.
Similarly, it is conceivable that large-scale real-life events can impact method effectiveness; for example, a natural disaster can deplete coping resources, resulting in a low effect size in a given study or perhaps even a set of studies; and it has been found that HIV risk behaviour interventions' effectiveness decreased with epidemic duration (Lacroix, Pellowski, Lennon, & Johnson, 2013).
Similar(51)
One DUT showed a low-effect size (0.30) (Table 2).> HRH information was captured from both the private and public health sectors.
Owing to the large sample size of at least 225 patients, it was possible to demonstrate a very low effect size of about 0.25 (a difference of 25% in the variability of the phenomenon investigated), which could be clinically insignificant.
Moreover, the probesets that were discarded by Global Contrast were characterized by a relatively low effect size compared to the probesets that were still included.
We also observed that deletion or LOH on 18q11.2 (short segment including CABLES1, odds ratio ≈ 3) was associated with dissemination in both data sets, but with a relatively low effect size (Additional file 1).
It is noteworthy that SNPs rs610604 (in TNFAIP3), rs187084, rs352140 and rs352162 (in TLR9) showed a rather low effect size (odds ratio (OR) = 1.00 to 1.04), implying that they have almost no or a rather weak contribution to SLE pathogenesis in the Chinese population.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com