Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
This paper presents a low-cost implementation of the sound-based localization method proposed in Halupka et al. [11].
The paper ends with the test of a low-cost implementation of the complete system under real center-pivot operation.
The parallel software has been tested on a low-cost implementation of a parallel architecture made up of a Linux cluster (Beowulf).
The proposed design is a low-cost implementation of an I-V tracer capable of producing a number of traces automatically within a fraction of second.
Alternatives to the zero-cost implementation highlighted above include a low-cost implementation.
Hence the low circuit complexity of the proposed architecture allows for a low-cost implementation.
Later, Corsonello et al.[29] proposed a low-cost implementation of NLS in order to improve the coding speed.
WZ video coding departs from the WZ theorem[3] on source coding with Side Information (SI) available only at the decoder, which is known to be a technique used to reduce the processing complexity of the encoder, leading to a low-cost implementation, while the majority of the computations are taken over by the decoder.
The pattern used within blocks is the vital facet for a low-cost implementation of the interconnection network of the decoder and can be based either on permutations, as in [6] and for the class of -rotation codes [17], or on circulants or cyclic shifts of the identity matrix, as in [8] and in every recent standards [1 3].
The resulting architecture aims at achieving optimal performance in terms of low-distortion and high power efficiency while still allowing a low-cost implementation: all the digital processing part integrated in a single device, for example, a low-complexity FPGA, plus off-chip components only for the power stage, made up of a MOS H-bridge and an LC filter but without any heat sink.
Finally, an efficient low cost implementation of our new algorithm using partial update adaptation is presented and evaluated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com