The phrase "a logical reasoning" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English. It is typically used to describe a line of thought or argument that follows a logical progression or makes sense based on evidence or premises. Example: The judge was convinced by the lawyer's use of a logical reasoning to prove her client's innocence.
"It's just a statistical fact that doesn't have any logical reasoning, Parseghian said in a phone interview last month.
Another interpretation of implication (A implies B) is that B is deducible from A by logical reasoning.
But the habits of thought -- the strategies people adopted in processing information and making sense of the world around them -- were, Western scholars assumed, the same for everyone, exemplified by, among other things, a devotion to logical reasoning, a penchant for categorization and an urge to understand situations and events in linear terms of cause and effect.
Candidates are put through a situational judgment test, a verbal and logical reasoning test, and an assessment day during which they undertake a range of exercises.
We imagined mind as a kind of logical reasoning device coupled with a store of explicit data a kind of combination logic machine and filing cabinet".
Under an abductive reasoning frame manipulation, which induced an inclination toward a form of logical reasoning that introduces hypotheses to explain given observations, individuals were more likely to accept concepts whereas under a deductive reasoning manipulation they were more likely to reject concepts.
A keen thinker who wrote works in philosophy, theology, mysticism, and scriptural exegesis, he attempted a wide-ranging synthesis of approaches to Islamic thought and argued for the necessity of the method of understanding reality through a mixture of logical reasoning, spiritual inspiration, and a deep meditation upon the key scriptural sources of the Twelver Shi'i tradition in Islam.
The RST is a series of logical reasoning procedures used for analyzing an information system.
Crenshaw (1990) [2] argues that because terrorist behaviour cannot be labelled as pathological or irrational due to the lack of empirical evidence to support such notions, it must therefore be considered a choice which is made following a process of logical reasoning.
'The Classifying activity uses a lot of logical reasoning as to why one card is similar to another.
