Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a list of lost" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an incomplete thought and lacks clarity, as it does not specify what is lost or provide context.
Example: "The report included a list of lost items from the inventory."
Alternatives: "a list of missing" or "a catalog of lost".
Exact(3)
By Geoffrey T. Hellman The New Yorker, March 2, 1940 P. 34 A list of lost Alumni sent out by Taft's school urging graduates to send in addresses of any one of those listed.
The detailed view presents information on the genomic locations of PA sites, the number of supporting reads, the median and mode of read ends in these clusters and links to a list of lost miRNA binding sites in the case of non-canonical PA site usage.
On a list of Lost episodes, the Los Angeles Times ranked "A Tale of Two Cities" number 66 out of 113 episodes, explaining it was "Not bad.
Similar(57)
Instead, the sender maintains a list of the lost packets and their corresponding receivers.
The reports repeated a now familiar list of lost opportunities in 2001 to follow leads that might have helped them unravel the impending assault, and disclosed new details about financial and policy failures contributing to the problems.
Several weeks earlier, he had seen a new doctor who'd prescribed several new drugs and spent much of the visit reciting a list of advice — lose weight, exercise more, stop smoking, eat more fruits and vegetables.
It would have saved me a lot of time!" In an industry that's notorious for neglecting its past — consider the long list of lost silent films — Smith stands out as an anomaly.
The older I get, the longer the list of lost loved ones becomes, so I get an early start on the process.
Mr. Sharpton's list of lost elections includes 1992 and 1994 runs for Senate, as well as a run for mayor of New York City in 1997.
Why is that too much to ask for?" Look at that list of lost lives.
If this had been the practice... the list of lost or delayed technologies and medical advances would be staggering.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com