Sentence examples for a less stringent cut off from inspiring English sources

To integrate genotype, expression and drug cytotoxicity data, we used an approach similar to "genomic convergence" [61] [63], as depicted graphically in Figure 2. We used a less stringent cut off for p-values used to identify the initial set of SNPs that were associated with IC50 to avoid missing possible candidates with biological significance.

We expected that a less stringent cut-off (e.g., 40%) would allow too many negative sequences in the phyloPWM, and that a more stringent cut-off (e.g., 90%) would not introduce enough variability.

We also replicated findings for ART adherence in a secondary analysis using a less stringent cut-off.

To select candidate proteins showing differential expression in Mtb-specific antigen-stimulated and unstimulated plasma samples, a less stringent cut-off value of P < 0.10 was applied.

Since LTC software requires a significance cut-off of 10−15 to build overlapping clones, any clone overlaps significant at a less stringent cut-off can be considered as unreliable.

Subsequently, we used a less stringent cut-off of R > 0.4 (p-value <10−5) resulting in age-associated hypermethylation at 431 CpG sites whereas 25 CpG sites were hypomethylated.

Initially, eQTL were identified in the first replicate with a p-value cut-off of 1E-6 (Additional File 1) but were validated in replicate 2 with a less stringent cut-off of 1E-5 [ 21].

Loops with sequence identity ≥ 60% to any other loop were excluded using the cd-hit suite (Huang et al., 2010) as suggested in Fernandez-Fuentes and Fiser (2006), even though other methods such as FREAD and LoopWeaver use a less stringent cut-off.

However, as the regression is performed on the group number rather than the actual disease onset age (the original linear relationship among different disease onset ages could be distorted to some extent), and the P-value just passes a less stringent cut-off (i.e., 0.05), more data and further analysis are needed to draw a more confident conclusion from above results.

We also selected two cut-off values for \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\widehat{r} }^2 $$\end{document }r ^ 2 : 0.8 as a stringent cut-off, and 0.4 as a less stringent cut-off.

This was the rationale for selecting less stringent cut off values for the IPA analyses (1.5-fold for the IPA vs. 2.0-fold for the identification of potential biomarkers of SCI).