The phrase "a lenient criterion for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing standards or rules that are not strict or harsh, often in contexts like evaluations, assessments, or guidelines.
Example: "The committee established a lenient criterion for evaluating the applicants, allowing more candidates to qualify for the program."
Alternatives: "a flexible standard for" or "a relaxed guideline for".
Because the average coverage depth is so high (82.72×), we opted for a lenient criteria for consensus identification in an effort to reduce false negative mutation calls by analyzing as many sites for putative mutations as possible.
As with the MPFC cluster, a more lenient criterion for defining the cluster resulted in the inclusion of TT voxels from all subjects in the cluster (Supplementary Fig. 5).
From a practical standpoint, these results suggest that adopting more lenient criteria for ordering DST for TB patients at individual health centers where risk for MDR TB is highest may be a rational approach while resources are limited.
The most lenient criteria for qualified mortar were formulated from the view of yield stress and plastic viscosity.
A failure to find statistically significant differences across the whole-brain may have prompted some studies to investigate case control differences within hypothesis-driven regions of interest (ROI), which apply more lenient criteria for evaluating the statistical significance of results.
Overall, the above comparisons indicate that, even when using very lenient criteria for homology and analysis, over half of Cbr-GLD-1-associated mRNAs were not detected as Ce-GLD-1 targets in two independent studies.
Sequential points further down the curve (i.e., toward the origin) specify increasingly stringent thresholds for defining improvement (i.e., larger decreases in investigator-rated total ADHD score), while points further up the curve denote the proportions of each treatment group that responded to treatment as determined by increasingly lenient criteria for improvement.
Out of these, FIC was not satisfied for 9 of them under the lenient criterion and for 17 of them under the strict criterion.
Note that filtering out markers on PMV <0.80 across panels (which is still a very lenient criterion) would have resulted in only 3419 markers being considered for subsequent analyses (Table S2).
Of the two thresholds, the minimal score of 1 may be too lenient a criterion for designating a response as deqi.
