The phrase "a later study has" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to research or findings that were published after an earlier study, indicating a chronological sequence of studies.
Example: "A later study has shown significant improvements in patient outcomes when using the new treatment protocol."
Alternatives: "subsequent research has" or "a following study has".
A later study has further shown that mutations in β-tubulin disrupt spindle orientation while affecting MT dynamics, thus again emphasizing the importance of tubulins and their polymerization status in spindle orientation.
A later study has confirmed that the duodenal and faecal microbiota was unbalanced in children with untreated disease, and only partially restored after a long period of eating a gluten-free diet.
However, a later study has shown that this is a misinterpretation because the antibody against TAK1 immunoprecipitated to some extent the CagA protein by unknown reasons, while in a reverse immunoprecipitation using a CagA antibody they also could not recognise co-immunoprecipitated TAK1 [ 60].
The later study has also reported SOCS2 as a significant independent predictor of good prognosis.
The later study has showed in transgenic rice plants that a HSFA4 from rice (OsHSFA4a), or from wheat (TaHSFA4a), can confer Cd tolerance.
Two of these studies were from Sweden and it is likely that the later study has some overlap of study subjects with those in the earlier study.
While the earliest studies of miRNA function in the immune system have demonstrated an essential role for miRNAs as a whole, later studies have focused on the contribution of specific miRNAs to specific immunologic processes.
And in the world of practicing doctors, would the time I spent away from medicine always remain "That-Period-Which-Shall-Not-Be-Named?" Now, nearly a decade later, studies have shown that more doctors than ever are choosing to take time off, at least twice as many as in previous generations.
The second criticism was that, in a systematic review of endoscopic ulcers in placebo arms of NSAID trials [ 21], early studies had no endoscopic ulcers while later studies had a significant rate of endoscopic ulcers, pointing to a failure of training [ 18].
The original MVH group had minimal information on the likely distribution of responses in large populations, and therefore adopted a limited pragmatic test, and later studies have not reconsidered this issue at all.
