The phrase "a later study comparing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a subsequent research study that evaluates or contrasts different subjects or variables.
Example: "A later study comparing the effects of sleep on cognitive performance revealed significant differences."
Alternatives: "a subsequent study analyzing" or "a following study examining".
In a later study, comparing the effects of 4 days of monocular deprivation among juvenile, fully adult (PD90 180) and mature (PD180 390) mice [10], visual evoked potential amplitude showed no significant difference among the age groups.
However, this finding was not confirmed in a later study comparing 25 women pregnant with trisomy-affected babies and 50 euploid healthy pregnancies [36].
A later study comparing fortified donor milk and preterm formula as supplements to fortified maternal milk also found slower growth associated with donor milk [ 1].
Janal et al. (1991) performed multidimensional scaling experiments on the dimensionality of painful and nonpainful electrocutaneous stimuli, and in a later study compared these stimuli to descriptive labels for painful and nonpainful stimuli (Janal, 1996).
The later study compared FDG, NaF and combined FDG/NaF-PET/CT scans in patients with varied cancers.
The later study compared 51 patients who had the compression bandage and no wound drainage with 54 patients who had a standard dressing and wound drainage, and it reported a significantly reduced amount of blood transfusion in the compression group but not a reduced proportion of transfused patients (Johansson et al. 2005a).
These five indicators were validated in a later study by comparing them to changes in clinical outcomes observed in patients newly initiating treatment; the results are reported in a companion paper [ 25].
Later studies compared it with other therapeutic options used in those areas, as is the case with amphotericin B deoxycholate, demonstrating that pentamidine was less effective [ 84].
31 In a later study, Dormann compared a CMS with prospective chart review over six months to detect possible ADRs by laboratory induced abnormalities.
No differences in biomarkers of lung epithelial injury were observed after 5 hours in a later study, which compared ventilation with VT 12 ml/kg ideal body weight without PEEP versus VT 6 ml/kg and PEEP 10 cmH2O [ 23].
In a later study, we compared the Exon Array's performance to that of other standard 3' arrays using the high quality MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) RNA [ 10], derived from human brain tissue and a universal human reference, and observed comparable performances between both types of platforms [ 11].
