The phrase "a later study by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a study that was conducted after a previous one, typically to provide additional evidence or findings.
Example: "A later study by Smith et al. (2020) found that the results were consistent with earlier research."
Alternatives: "a subsequent study by" or "a following study by".
A later study, by a group that included The New York Times, used two methods to count ballots: relying on the judgment of a majority of those examining each ballot, or requiring unanimity.
He wrote a number of books, rather serious works written with little flourish, and there were two books about him, one by AG Moyes and a later study by Mark Browning.
She said the language on the labels for the drug had been strengthened to include, among other things, details from the 2012 study, and information from a later study by Pfizer.
A later study, by Abramson and colleagues at the National Center for Disaster Preparedness in 2010, concluded that children exposed to the Katrina disaster were five times more likely than a comparable group of children not exposed to Katrina to show signs of serious emotional disturbance.
A later study by Lusci et al. [33] that was performed on ChEMBL data release 13 benchmarked the performance of a number of different algorithms.
This hypothesis was adjusted in a later study by the same group, in which they showed that only the monoubiquitination of SMAD4 is mediated by Ectodermin (Dupont et al., 2009).
However, despite these promising results with fractionation protocols, a later study by Kolby et al. demonstrated that the SSTR2 receptors were saturated when doses above 30 MBq were given in one fraction [27].
However, the color of verditer should be interpreted carefully as a later study by van Loon points out the difficulty in distinguishing the exact color of blue and green verditer under the light microscope [25].
A later study by Puyen et al., in patient with peritonitis due to gut or biliary tract perforation, was specifically designed to detect differences in 28-day mortality, but a mortality rate of 27.7 and 19.5 % was found in the treatment and control group, respectively (p = 0.14).
A later study by Woolpert suggested at least 150000 sqft of retail and a parking structure that has 800 to 1,400 spaces.
A later study by Greenberg and Associates showed similar results and concluded that pushing back on corporate influence is key to establishing trust and credibility with voters on issues like the economy and jobs.
