The phrase "a large preference for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when expressing a strong inclination or liking for something over others.
Example: "In the survey, participants showed a large preference for outdoor activities compared to indoor ones."
Alternatives: "a strong preference for" or "a significant preference for".
Two out of ten subjects did not have a preference, three had a small preference for the learned noise reduction settings, and five had a large preference for learned noise reduction settings (so 80% of the subjects had an overall preference for the learned settings).
To do so we consider a specific case in which the bad health disposition agents who have made their initial choice with the type that exhibits the lowest concern for health, that is (R^{b}_{1}), face both a high price for health and a large preference for consumption.
This result is displayed in Figure 4b. Figure 4 Influence of on the active base station fraction F A. When using femtocells (Figure 4a), even in cases with a large preference for high bit rates (α = -5) the fraction of active base stations is lower than the theoretical maximum.
Palindrome cleavage also differs markedly in this respect from the disintegration reaction that can be performed by CC, ΔC or ΔN truncated proteins only in the presence of Mn2+, or by the full-length IN with a large preference for Mn2+ over Mg2+ [24], [24].
In our survey, we found a large preference for immobilization of the shoulder in internal rotation position.
For t-SO, the calculated free energy barriers suggest a large preference for nucleophilic attack at C(1) over C(2).
The remaining elements may substitute for both sublattices: Mn is most likely to go for the Ni sublattice; V, Cr, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf, Ta, W and Ge have a larger preference for the Al sublattice, but Cr and W do not show significant preference to any sublattice.
By contrast, if the concern for health associated with (R^{m}_{1}), for any (min {mathcal {M}}), would not imply a relatively large preference for consumption the focus of the fresh start policy would turn to those who change their preferences.
In contrast, patients had a very large preference for 95% sensitivity of the test (OR = 5.23).
In addition, 85% of all patients expressed a 'large' or 'very large' preference for once-daily compared with thrice-daily hydrocortisone treatment, and over 90% of patients with diabetes mellitus expressed a preference for once-daily treatment [ 6].
A score of 0 on this variable would mean the infant's looking-time preference was identical when discriminating HTO and LTO objects; a positive value would indicate that infants exhibited a larger novelty preference for HTO than LTO objects, and vice versa for a negative score.
